Dnipro University of Technology — Compliance with the Time

Evaluation


Selection Criteria

a) Financial capacity: In line with the Financial Regulation and the Rules for Participation. At the proposal stage, coordinators will be invited to complete a self-assessment using an on-line tool.

b) Operational capacity: As a distinct operation, carried out during the evaluation of the award criterion Quality and efficiency of the implementation, experts will indicate whether the participants meet the selection criterion related to operational capacity, to carry out the proposed work, based on the competence and experience of the individual participant(s).

Award criteria

Experts will evaluate on the basis of the criteria excellence, impact and quality and efficiency of the implementation. The aspects to be considered in each case depend on the types of action as set out in the table below, unless stated otherwise in the call conditions.

Type of action

Excellence

Impact

Quality and efficiency of the implementation

The following aspects will be taken into account, to the extent that the proposed work corresponds to the topic description in the work programme:

The extent to which the outputs of the project should contribute at the European and/or International level to:

The following aspects will be taken into account:

All types of action

Clarity and pertinence of the objectives;

Credibility of the

proposed approach.

The expected impacts listed in the work programme under the relevant topic

Coherence and effectiveness of the work plan, including appropriateness of the allocation of tasks and resources;

Complementarity of the participants within the consortium (when relevant);

Appropriateness of the management structures and procedures, including risk and innovation management.

Research and

innovation;

Innovation; SME

instrument

Soundness of the concept, including trans-disciplinary considerations, where relevant;

Extent that proposed work is ambitious, has innovation potential, and is beyond the state of the art (e.g. ground-breaking objectives, novel concepts and approaches)

Enhancing innovation capacity and integration of new knowledge;

Strengthening the competitiveness and growth of companies by developing innovations meeting the needs of European and global markets; and, where relevant, by delivering such innovations to the markets;

Any other environmental and socially important impacts (not already covered above);

Effectiveness of the proposed measures to exploit and disseminate the project results (including management of IPR), to communicate the project, and to manage research data where relevant.

Coordination & support actions

Soundness of the concept;

Quality of the proposed coordination and/or support measures.

Effectiveness of the proposed measures to exploit and disseminate the project results (including management of IPR), to communicate the project, and to manage research data where relevant.

ERA-NET Cofund

Level of ambition in the collaboration and commitment of the participants in the proposed ERA-NET action to pool national resources and coordinate their national/regional research programmes.

Achievement of critical mass for the funding of trans-national projects by pooling of national/regional resources and contribution to establishing and strengthening a durable cooperation between the partners and their national/regional research programmes;

Effectiveness of the proposed measures to exploit and disseminate the project results and to communicate the project.

Pre-commercial procurement

Cofund/Public procurement of innovative

solutions Cofund

Progress beyond the state of the art in terms of the degree of innovation needed to satisfy the procurement need.

Strengthening the competitiveness and growth of companies by developing innovations meeting the needs of European and global procurement markets

Effectiveness of the proposed measures to exploit and disseminate the project results (including management of IPR), to communicate the project.

More forward-looking concerted procurement approaches that reduce fragmentation of demand for innovative solutions


Note

Unless otherwise specified in the call conditions:

(a) Evaluation scores will be awarded for the criteria, and not for the different aspects listed in the above table. For full proposals, each criterion will be scored out of 5. The threshold for individual criteria will be 3. The overall threshold, applying to the sum of the three individual scores, will be 10.

(b) For Innovation actions and the SME instrument (phases 1 and 2), to determine the ranking, the score for the criterion impact will be given a weight of 1.5.

(c) For the evaluation of first-stage proposals under a two-stage submission procedure, only the criteria excellence and impact will be evaluated. Within these criteria, only the aspects in bold will be considered. The threshold for both individual criteria will be 4.

Services

Schedule

Social networks

Facebook
YouTube
© 2006-2024 Інформація про сайт